论坛交流
外汇EA
MT5 EA
MT4 EA
外汇指标
MT5 指标
MT4 指标
工具/资源
简体中文
繁体中文
English
한국어
日本語
Français
Italiano
Deutsch
Русский
登录
注册
找回密码
快速登录
简体中文
繁体中文
English
한국어
日本語
Français
Italiano
Deutsch
Русский
论坛交流
外汇EA
MT5 EA
MT4 EA
外汇指标
MT5 指标
MT4 指标
工具/资源
登录
注册
找回密码
快速登录
更多资料
搜索内容
Liam
关注
私信
文章
0
收藏
0
评论
5
粉丝
0
12天前
sure
@laptop
评论于：
神马丁 有dll MT5（修复）
13天前
I compare them based on more than just profitability. I look at drawdown, profit factor, consistency, risk-to-reward, and how well they perform across different market conditions. I also pay close attention to forward testing and execution on a live account, since an EA that looks great in backtests may perform differently in real trading. For me, consistency and risk management matter just as much as returns.
@百里挑E
评论于：
神马丁 有dll MT5（修复）
16天前
Yeah, that could explain it. No stop-loss can definitely leave a position exposed to a big move against you.
@psp5153057
评论于：
Institutional SMC Robot
16天前
How can i get added to the group
@wangxiaobo
评论于：
Institutional SMC Robot
16天前
Anyone running this on a real account rather than demo? Would be interested in hearing how execution compares. If you had to choose between a high-return EA with bigger drawdown and a slower EA with tighter risk, which would you take? For those who've tested several EAs, what usually separates the good ones from the ones that look good only in backtests?
评论于：
神马丁 有dll MT5（修复）
登录
没有账号？立即注册
邮箱
验证码
发送验证码
记住登录
账号密码登录
登录
用户名或邮箱
登录密码
记住登录
找回密码
|
免密登录
登录
社交账号登录
注册
已有账号，立即登录
设置用户名
邮箱
验证码
发送验证码
设置密码
注册
